I’m conflicted about this book. I have read John Green’s work before, and I love his writing style and characters. However, Paper Towns does, as other reviewers have mentioned, tread well-worn ground: in many ways, his characters Quentin (“Q”) and Margo may as well be clones of Miles (“Pudge”) and Alaska in Looking for Alaska, or Colin and his Katherines in An Abundance of Katherines. The formula seems to be the same: Take one intelligent, quirky, neurotic, nerdy-geeky guy. Add one unattainable, mysterious, beautiful/bad-ass/brilliant girl with at least one deep flaw, not immediately apparent, who this guy obsesses over anyway. Throw in a dash of ethnically random friends who are even quirkier than the guy, and about as intelligent, which results in incredibly quirky, witty, though sometimes hokey, banter between them.
However, Green executes this formula excellently. I’m torn between giving Paper Towns or Alaska the crown, here, since I liked different things about the books. I think Alaska had the better plot, since Paper Towns starts off with engines roaring, switches gears abruptly, chugs along at a steady pace, then peters to a put-putting halt. There’s so much beautifully worked tension that builds and builds, but toward the last third of the book, I found the suspense exhausting and started reading so fast the words blurred, just to get to the end. When I did hit that final climactic scene, it was anti-climactic. I went through the final pages, hoping, hoping, then cried, “What? Seriously? Was that IT?” and wanted to throttle a certain character.
Although… I suspect Green intended the ending to be a little anti-climactic, at least according to the setup of the story and the expectations of Quentin, which I shared. I don’t think Green wanted Paper Towns to be a book that fulfilled readers’ desires for a tidy plot, perfect romance, or happy ending, since these literary devices rarely occur in reality. Paper Towns appears to aim higher, and deeper, for a story that makes you question what fulfillment and purpose actually mean. His exploration of the term “paper towns” being a prime example. But still, I can’t say it wasn’t disappointing.
Different readers will take away different messages from this book. I recommend that you read it if you’re looking for beautifully written contemporary YA, or if you like literary explorations of character. However, don’t expect Paper Towns to satisfy your every desire as a reader. That is, I think, the point.
I read Looking For Alaska and I loved it but I haven't read any of his other books so I wouldn't know about them all being similar. I do think this one sounds like one I might like but I am sad that you were disappointed by the end. That's either the best or the worst part of a book. Oh well, I will give it a shot. =]
Hi Katie!
I encourage you to read PAPER TOWNS for yourself; like I say in my review, I think different readers will get different things from this one. That's the beauty of Green's writing: it's emotionally complex and open to interpretation.
Best,
Karen